Two cameras placed at a set are better than one! Today's results proved this.
A few weeks ago, my father and I headed west to put up two of my cameras out into the woods.
We had two cameras to use and decided to place them both up at the same set. We wondered if this would be a good or a bad idea, because if somebody was to find one of the cameras, they would most likely find both of the cameras.
It turned out to be a good idea when we checked them today.
Both of us had the day off, so we headed back out to the same place to review the SD cards that store the pictures in the cameras, change a few things, and replace any dead batteries.
It's a difficult camera-trap set to get to.
Driving west, it takes about 45 minutes to arrive at a trail head that leads to the site. Hiking out, wading through skunk cabbage, and watching your footing on scree and boulders are all part of the process of getting to the cameras here. It's a good little hike.
The one camera hasn't been working too well, so we took it down to take home with us. The other camera (one made by Wildgame Innovations) takes better quality pictures and has a trigger system that works well, so we kept it there, protected in a bear-resistant case, to continue taking pictures.
Results of this camera weren't fantastic, but a few animals did come by.
An opossum appeared in 9 pictures and a fox appeared in 1 picture.
There were 24 total pictures, most of which were of squirrels or nothing (false triggers).
I've got the camera that we took down, sitting right next to me. I'll decide where to put it next in a day or two.
No comments:
Post a Comment